Page 105 - 17_Atti_SNO_2023_flip
P. 105
Proceedings SNO “LXII Congresso Nazionale SNO”
BIBLIOGRAFIA 3. Abidi Z, Faeghi F, Mardanshahi Z, Mortazavi H. Assessment
of the diagnostic accuracy of double inversion recovery se-
1. Tomura N, Saginoya T, Sanpei T, Konno T, Fujihara K. quence compared with FLAIR and T2W_TSE in detection of
Contrast-enhanced double inversion recovery sequence for cerebral multiple sclerosis lesions. Electron Physician 2017; 9
patients with multiple sclerosis: feasibility of subtraction im- (4): 4162-4170.
ages between pre- and post-contrast images. Acta Radiol 4. Vural G, Keklikoglu HD, Temel S, Deniz O, Ercan K.
2023; 64 (2): 719-724.
Comparison of double inversion recovery and conventional
2. ichinger P, Kirschke JS, Hoshi MM, Zimmer C, Mühlau M, magnetic resonance brain imaging in patients with multiple
Riederer I. Pre- and postcontrast 3D double inversion recov- sclerosis and relations with disease disability. Neuroradiol J
ery sequence in multiple slerosis: a simple and effective MR 2013; 26 (2): 133-142.
imaging protocol. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017; 38 (10):
1941-1945.
- 103 -
